QA and test automation catch problems before your customers do, with automated tests on every change and manual testing where judgment matters. We used unit, integration and acceptance tests on BuffyHub and SonarQube checks on Truck-4.
Reviewed by Azmat Rana, CEO & Founder · Updated
Bugs are cheapest to fix the hour they are written and most expensive once a customer finds them.
Core capability
Unit, integration and acceptance tests that run on every change. BuffyHub was covered at all three levels.
End-to-end tests in Selenium that click through sign-up, checkout and other key flows the way a real user would.
Static analysis with SonarQube in the CI pipeline, as on Truck-4, so risky code is flagged before review.
A person working through new features on real devices, looking for what scripts miss.
Scanning uploaded files and validating inputs. Truck-4 scans every upload with ClamAV before accepting it.
Testing starts where a failure would hurt most, then widens.
Review
We list the journeys that earn money, the parts that break most often and how releases happen today.
Plan
We decide what to automate, what to test by hand and what each release has to pass.
Automate
Unit, integration and browser tests for the riskiest flows go into the CI pipeline first.
Run
Every change runs the suite, new features get manual testing, and failures block the release.
The testing and pipeline tools used across our projects.
Selenium
Docker
GitHubNot every product needs a large test suite. These are the signs yours does.
Regressions mean nothing checks old behavior after a change. Automated tests do that on every release.
If the team holds its breath at every deploy, tests and a staging check give that confidence back.
Cover the journeys that earn money with browser tests first.
Code checks like SonarQube keep standards the same whoever wrote the change.
Scripts check what you already know. People find what nobody thought of.
Test the risky and valuable parts well. Coverage for its own sake slows teams down without making releases safer.
Products where testing was part of the build.
Projects like this one usually involve these as well.
What teams ask before they add QA to their releases.
Automated unit, integration and browser tests, code quality checks in your pipeline, and manual testing of new features before they go live.
Yes. We start with the flows that earn money or break most often, add tests around them, and widen coverage as other parts change.
Selenium for browser tests, xUnit on .NET projects and each language’s standard test framework, with SonarQube for code quality, all run in CI.
Yes. We wire them into your CI pipeline so every change runs the suite, as on Truck-4 with Azure DevOps.
Yes. We can work as a separate QA team beside your developers, writing tests and checking each release before it goes live.
You do. Everything we build for you, including the source code and the intellectual property in it, belongs to you.
Tell us how you test today and what keeps breaking, and we will suggest where automation pays off first.